Archives

Contribute to Our Research

That’s Odd…

Disney has just released their press preview for the 2010 slate (more on that forthcoming), but one bit caught my eye. They’ve listed next year’s animated release Rapunzel as having a “working title.” Working title? You haven’t decided yet?

It’s been quite a while since the film (in it’s Shrek-era phase) was known as Rapunzel Unbraided, but I never would have guessed that its title had yet to be nailed down. What the heck else would you call it? Hair: The Musical (No, Not That One)?

For the morbidly curious, here’s the rest of the slate:

WHEN IN ROME
Release date: January 29

ALICE IN WONDERLAND
Release date: March 5

THE LAST SONG
Release date: April 2

OCEANS
Release date: April 22

PRINCE OF PERSIA: THE SANDS OF TIME
Release date: May 28

TOY STORY 3
Release date: June 18

THE SORCERER’S APPRENTICE
Release date: July 16

STEP UP 3D
Release date: August 6

YOU AGAIN
Release date: September 24

SECRETARIAT
Release date: October 8

RAPUNZEL [working title]
Release date: November 12 (limited)
November 24 (wide)

TRON: LEGACY
Release date: December 17

Related Posts...

!ATTENTION! Important Notice!

To to some backstage technical shuffling, everyone who is subscribed to the Progress City RSS feed should update it by clicking here.

Thanks!

Related Posts...

MacPhee, RFID, And Thee

The hits keep on rollin’ today as Disney announced that Jim MacPhee, former Vice President responsible for EPCOT, has been promoted to Vice President, Next Generation Experience and Walt Disney World Parks. This makes MacPhee the head of operations at Walt Disney World, reporting to resort president Meg Crofton and presiding over the vice presidents of the four individual theme parks.

This is great news. MacPhee, whose Disney cred goes back to 1982, when he was a parking lot attendant during EPCOT Center’s grand opening, is known in fan circles as one of the “good guys.” Reports from inside the resort say that he’s well liked by his cast members, and that he’s a stickler for quality.

MacPhee has been well known to fans since 2007, when as newly-minted VP of EPCOT he reversed the decision to ignore that park’s 25th anniversary and whipped up, in a short amount of time, a day of festivities for fans celebrating the park’s history. A good time was had by all, and MacPhee must have shaken a thousand hands that day as he engaged in conversations with fans for hours. He also, at my request, tried some Beverly. Pictures forthcoming.

Earlier in the year MacPhee was moved from his position at EPCOT to the rather nebulous slot as vice president of “special projects.” This concerned many, who feared that it was just a way of sidelining a pesky executive who was reluctant to cut corners.

It appears, though, that MacPhee was really in his secret lab preparing the mysterious new “Next Generation Experience.” There are many rumors about what this might entail, which I’ve reported on since April, but by and large it’s all still a mystery. Surely, since they’ve announced this change in MacPhee’s position, an explanation will be forthcoming.

In any case, the citizens of Progress City offer their most effusive congratulations to Mr. MacPhee on his promotion. Applause is also warranted for those in the power structure who decided on this promotion, so to Ms. Crofton or even Mr. Rasulo – well done.

Related Posts...

Roy

Roy Disney in Honolulu after completing the Transpac Yacht Race in 2005Roy Disney, smiling in Honolulu after completing the 43rd Transpacific Yacht Race on July 24, 2005. Disney and his crew aboard the Pyewacket finished second in the race. (AP Photo)

What’s weird is that I was thinking about Roy E. Disney just this morning.

I don’t remember why; my Disney-related reveries while I should be getting other work done are so common that they’re hard to trace back to a specific point. But I was thinking about Roy and I was concerned. There have been rumors for a while that he wasn’t in the best of health; I hadn’t heard anything specific, of course, but I became worried when he didn’t show up for D23, or the dedication of the Walt Disney Family Museum, or the publicity junkets for The Princess and the Frog.

Roy E. Disney on the Disney lot in Burbank, December 1, 1967I had expected him to be present for each of these, and looked forward to his contributions to each. After all, considering everything he’s given the company it would be exciting to see him get a huge ovation at the D23 Expo or to be able to preside over the return of Disney animation. A lot of the good things going on with Disney are in many ways fruits of his efforts, and I had hoped that he would get to see how much we all appreciated it.

Lots has been said today about these contributions, of course, and much has been written over the last few decades about the changes Roy helped bring about at Disney. He came to the fore, of course, in 1984, when he helped bring about the ouster of his cousin-by-marriage Ron Miller from the management of Walt Disney Productions. By securing the company from hostile takeover attempts and bringing in new management in the form of Michael Eisner, Frank Wells and Jeffery Katzenberg, Disney changed the course of the company his father and uncle founded in 1923. Then things really got interesting.

The story of Roy “saving” Disney is far more complicated that most news stories today would have you think. I’m sure we don’t know a fraction of what really happened, and it’s hard to say what would have happened had he not acted to bring in new management. Most of Roy’s discontent with the company’s creative stagnation seemed rooted in the Walker years; Miller had only recently taken over and was making a push to revive the studio’s fortunes. Many of Eisner’s early successes came from continuing programs that Miller had put in place before his departure, but the end result of the turmoil in 1984 was that Eisner and Wells were seen as reviving a moribund company – and Roy was the prodigal son that had made it all happen and saved his family’s studio.

Ron Miller and Roy E. Disney, December 1967Happier times: Ron Miller, left, and Roy E. Disney discuss projects on the Disney Studios lot in Burbank on December 1st, 1967. (AP Photo)

Speculation aside, though, one thing is certain – Roy saved Disney animation.

Hardly anyone wanted to keep it going when Eisner arrived in 1984. The division had sort of trailed off, and although new talent tried to fill the shoes of the now-retired Nine Old Men, they received little guidance, support, or interest from management. The company’s attention had been devoted to the construction and opening of EPCOT Center in 1982, and the studio side of the business had fallen onto hard times. Eisner and Wells, along with Jeff Katzenberg, were devoted to turning Disney into a major film studio, but their plan didn’t include animation.

Michael Eisner and Roy Disney at Animal Kingdom's dedication ceremony, April 21, 1998Thankfully, Roy was there. Wells and Katzenberg wanted to close the animation studio. They knew that overseas animators could crank work out much, much cheaper, and in the mid-1980s no one cared if the hit animation on Saturday mornings was of any quality or not. Eisner, though, knew that he owed his new role as a movie mogul to Roy’s efforts and gave him his choice of assignments at the revived studio. Roy, of course, chose to oversee Disney feature animation.

This critical decision led Eisner to overrule Wells and Katzenberg, and Roy was soon upgrading and updating the animation studio in preparation for a string of hits that defined the Walt Disney Company in the 1990s. Without Roy, it’s not unreasonable to presume that the great tradition of Disney animation would have ended with The Black Cauldron in 1985. Would we have Pixar today? We certainly wouldn’t have Dreamworks. Without Disney around to prove that animated features could still hit big – something that was truly doubted in the 1980s! – would we still have an American animation industry?

One of my hopes when I began this blog was that maybe – maybe – it would be a way to reach out to those people whom I truly admired, and to maybe some day cross their paths so I could thank them for all that they have given the world through their work. I was skeptical that would ever happen, so in many ways it’s been far easier that I ever expected to speak to some of these people. Those wonderful people I met at the D23 Expo, and the kind Disney people past and present that I continue to cross paths with online, have allowed me a chance to express a bit of gratitude for their years of hard work.

Foremost among those people that I had wished to meet was Roy E. Disney. Sadly, now I never will. While his loss is obviously greater to the family who loved him and the company that he held dear, and my petty celebrity-stalking dreams don’t really matter in this equation, it would have been really nice to thank him. Fifty-six years with the Disney company, and taking no end of grief throughout – it’s a complicated story, I’m sure, but you can’t deny the efforts of someone who keeps coming back again and again to try and keep that flame alive no matter how many people try and put it out.

Roy E. Disney receives his Disney Legends award, 1998Disney Legend Roy E. Disney, 1998 (AP Photo)

Most everyone probably thought that Roy’s big contribution to the company would remain his 1984 coup against management, so it came as an ironic shock twenty years later when he staged another attempt at regime change – this time, against the man that he brought in to run Disney all those years ago. Roy’s “Save Disney” campaign to remove Michael Eisner from his role as Chairman and CEO came at an exceptionally low point for Disney fans, and revived the spirits of many who had lost hope.

The company had been in a slow decline since Frank Wells’s death in 1994, and seemed to have entered a freefall as Eisner loaded the executive ranks with incompetent cronies. The parks were at an all-time low, with new gates like California Adventure becoming synonymous with failure in the culture at large. The animation department, too, had fallen on hard times, and it looked like traditional animation had seen its last gasp. Like with The Black Cauldron in 1985, it now seemed that Disney animation would end ignominiously with Home on the Range.

But Roy rallied the troops, this time using the internet to speak directly to fans. His initial salvo – a blistering open letter addressed to Eisner – said publicly what so many fans had wanted to hear for so long. Roy called Eisner on the carpet for the decline of quality at the parks and in animation, and for the widely-held perception that the company was now a faceless corporation that could no longer control its greed. The fact that we were hearing these things said – in public – and on a national stage seemed miraculous.

Even more earthshaking was the result of Roy’s initial Save Disney efforts – at the Disney company shareholders’ meeting in 2004, an astonishing 45% of shares were voted against re-electing Eisner to the board. This fairly unprecedented rebuke led, within a year, to Eisner’s early departure from the company.

Whatever his motives, and whatever the outcome of those events, I will forever be grateful to Roy for giving voice to the hordes of fans who had been driven to despair over the state of the company. It was wonderful to know that someone else – someone who could do something about it – actually cared, and that it wasn’t completely futile to hope that Disney could once more aspire to some semblance of quality.

I guess the reason this all hits so hard, and why I was crushed when that headline came across my news ticker this afternoon, is that for my generation – those of us too young to remember Walt or Roy O. – Roy was our Disney. His physical resemblance to his uncle Walt is obvious, and for this generation he was the Disney family member that you could always expect to see pop up to represent the family. This was especially true in later years, as documentaries on television and DVD became more frequent and sought to tell the stories from the studio’s past. Roy was always there.

I can only hope that someone in the family – either from Walt’s side or Roy’s side – will take this as a call to step up to the plate. There always needs to be a Disney, scrapping away with the Disney company to make sure the ideals of its founders aren’t completely forgotten. If we hadn’t had a Disney there in 1984, or 2003, who knows how bad it would be now. Answer the call.

The company should also take this as a reminder of their roots in traditional animation, and redouble their efforts to restore that aspect of the company. One of the things I’m most grateful to Roy for is that he, more than anyone, pushed for years to get Fantasia 2000 made. It’s hard to imagine that happening again, but I hope against hope that someone will make it happen. It wasn’t so long ago that Fantasia 2006 was on the cards, and again we have Roy to thank for the fact that we now have the privilege of seeing Destino finished. We owe him big for all those things, but there’s so much left to do.

There’s so much more that could be said about Roy’s life; his sailing, his philanthropy… I’ve left out his enormous devotion to the company’s nature films; he cut his teeth on the True-Life Adventures, after all, and the DisneyNature brand is another direct descendant of his works. I’m so glad he lived to see that happen.

Anyway, Roy, it’s possible that we’ll never know all the ways that you quietly (and not-so-quietly) steered the course of the company over the last thirty or so years. But for the things that we do know, and for the legacy you worked so hard to keep alive, I thank you.

Roy Disney at Save Disney meeting, 2004

Related Posts...

The Taming Of The Mouse

Clarabelle Cow reads Elinor Glyn's Three Weeks“Wouldn’t you rather have your child watching cartoons than… than reading Elinor Glyn?” “What Elinor Glyn reads is her mother’s business!”

One thing that many Disney fans have long groused about, and something that I’ve talked about here, is the process by which Mickey Mouse has been transformed over the years from a funny and entertaining character to a bland corporate icon. Many people forget that those early black and white Mickey shorts were hilarious; Mickey came off as a cross between Chaplin and Douglas Fairbanks, finding himself in a number of out-sized adventures based on the popular fiction of the day.

But the issue of Mickey’s slide into mediocrity isn’t something we can blame on Michael Eisner or the latter-day corporatization of the company. It isn’t even something we can hang on the meek stewardship of Card Walker. No, this is a rare problem that goes all the way back to Walt’s rule – way, way back as a matter of fact.

Article about censorship of Disney cartoons, New York Times, Nov. 16th 1930From the New York Times, November 16th, 1930

It seems that the issue of what Mickey would or wouldn’t, or should or shouldn’t, do goes all the way back to his infancy. In 1930, just two years after his theatrical debut and at the height of his popularity, a number of theaters and localities were already up in arms about the scandalous antics of the world’s favorite cartoon character. Perhaps it’s no surprise; after all, busybodies and self-appointed crusaders for virtue have plagued popular entertainment since time immemorial. But rarely have the efforts of the thought police centered so heavily on the wardrobe of animated mice or the reading habits of cows.

This censorship proved more than a minor irritant to Disney, though. “Objectionable” scenes couldn’t be merely snipped out of the films, they had to be replaced with new scenes so as to not disturb the timing of the soundtrack. I wonder if these scenes, mentioned in the following interview with Mr. Mouse from November of 1930, still exist?

Interview with Mickey Mouse about censorship, LA Times, Nov. 23 1930From the Los Angeles Times, November 23rd, 1930

Epic Mickey preliminary box artThe subject of Mickey’s relevance as an entertainer has been a hot topic lately; this seems to happen at least once a decade. It happened in the 1980s after Michael Eisner’s arrival at Disney, and it happened in the 1990s with the release of Runaway Brain. We’ve also seen attempts at revivals with the Mickey Mouse Works and House of Mouse television anthologies. This time, the discussion accompanies the hype leading up to 2010’s release of Epic Mickey for the Wii gaming console. Designer Warren Spector had been reluctant to tackle a Mickey-related title, as the character has become so devoid of… character. Like many of the previous attempted revivals, Spector has looked to Mickey’s early work for inspiration. The early peeks have been intriguing, with many characters from Mickey’s early years and adventures in print popping up. Oswald the Lucky Rabbit and the Phantom Blot? Yes, please.

Hopefully, there won’t be any Elinor Glyn.

"We Are Mickey" from "Mickey is 60", 1988The men behind Mickey in 1988 and their thoughts about the character. From left to right: Wayne Allwine, Floyd Norman, Roman Arambula, Glen Keane, Ollie Johnston, Frank Thomas and Mark Henn.

Related Posts...