Archives

Contribute to Our Research

CURSE YOU DISNEY!!!

Curse you for doing awesome, well-conceived things that I desperately want but are so incredibly expensive! Currrrseeeee yoooouuuuuuuuuu….

Seriously, this is a great idea. D23 is producing a limited-series collection of all the released Walt Disney Treasures DVD sets to date. This 54-disc collection will set you back $500, but it’s the only way to get most of these titles, many of which have been out of print for years. Now all I have to do is figure out if the price of the set is more that it would cost me to buy on eBay the out-of-print sets that I don’t already own. Grr.

When D23 started, I suggested that if they really want to make the fans happy (and make some money themselves), they should keep in print all the fan-friendly DVDs like the Treasures line that are now unavailable in stores. It’s insane to me that these sets are printed in such limited quantities only to disappear; it doesn’t do Disney any good if they’re selling for $100 on eBay.

A collection isn’t exactly what I had in mind – it’s being sold to D23 members, ostensibly the most devout fans, but these are the folks who are most likely to have been buying the releases all along. There needs to be a way to fill in the gaps in one’s collection – there are some that I’d love to have that I missed somehow – without dropping $500 for duplicates.

But still, it’s a great idea and for those who haven’t been collecting these so far it’s an enormous deal and a fantastic trove of rarely-seen genius. I hope they keep this series alive – every year, it seems, they threaten to end it. But it seems to me that Disney should at least have some product available that comes directly from the Disney himself. There’s nothing wrong with a little fan service, especially when it makes you money. After all, the cost of pressing DVDs is negligible once the content is created. Give the people what they want!

And I want that collection, so give me that!

Related Posts...

Obama’s Shanghai Surprise?

For nearly two decades, beginning with Frank Wells wining and dining Chinese officials in 1990, the Disney corporation has danced around the possibility of building a theme park in Shanghai. China’s largest city was long a target destination for former Disney CEO Michael Eisner, but despite frequent negotiations during the 1990s the park was never built. Some sources claim that Disney themselves delayed the plans, unsure that the city was ready to support such a project. On the other hand, in the wake of the Tiananmen Square massacre the Chinese government was keen to stem the tide of western cultural influences in their territories.

Global map of Shanghai Disneyland locationMap of the future Shanghai Disneyland site, zooming from a global view (top) to the site itself (bottom). Click to enlarge.

By the turn of the century, Disney’s attention was diverted to the planning and construction of Hong Kong Disneyland and Shanghai was put on the back burner. Work continued on the project; Disney signed a deal to build a park on the Chinese mainland in 2002, and, rejecting bids for the park by Beijing and Tianjin, contracted with Shanghai’s Lujiazui Group to develop a site there. But when the park in Hong Kong opened to poor reviews and seriously underperformed financially, Disney was forced to enter into years of intractable negotiations about the hundreds of millions of dollars needed to enhance that resort and progress stalled again on the Shanghai project. These delays were compounded further by a 2006 corruption scandal within the Shanghai government, which implicated local Communist Party chief Chen Liangyu. Still, Shanghai remained one of Disney’s key initiatives; the now-famous rendering from the 2006 Disney annual report shows a “new Disney theme park” that many believe to be a concept for the Shanghai park.

Rendering of possible Shanghai Disneyland, 2006Possible rendering of Shanghai Disneyland concept, 2006

The rendering, shown above, depicts a new type of layout for a Disney park. Surrounding a central lake, it more resembles Universal’s Island of Adventure. Various lands that can been seen in the illustration; one resembles Tokyo DisneySea’s Mermaid Lagoon, there’s a futuristic area visually reminiscent of the original DisneySea’s Future Research Center, a fairytale castle sits atop a hill with a rollercoaster in the distance behind, there’s a South American temple straight out of Indiana Jones, and a European village surrounding the castle. Despite the prominent placement of this image in a widely-distributed publication, little else was seen or heard stateside about the Shanghai efforts.

In the Asian press, though, gossip about the park continued over the years. In March of 2006, Shanghai’s mayor had announced “preliminary preparations” for the park. Two years later, in March 2008, Mayor Han Zheng announced that the city had officially applied to the Chinese central government to build the park. Negotiations ground on.

This year, though, the wheels of progress began to slowly turn once more. A series of approvals, leaked in the state-run and local media, traced the slow but steady development of the resort plan. Since January when Mayor Han Zheng announced that the city had signed a nonbinding agreement and project report with Disney, and Disney themselves confessed to the plans, all parties have been waiting for word from Beijing. In June, it’s believed that the project was approved by the National Development and Reform Commission, the Chinese government’s economic planning agency. Earlier this week, the state-run Securities Times reported that the central government in Beijing had given its final approval to the plan earlier this month, and that it was now up to Shanghai officials and Disney to finalize the details of the deal.

According to Reuters, they may finally have a deal. Sources are speculating to the wire service that a deal may be announced during U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to China from November 15th-18th. A front-page editorial this week in the state-run Shanghai Securities News called for such an announcement, giving a great deal of credence to the notion. News stories anticipating an “upcoming” announcement have popped up frequently over the years, but the recent string of significant advances suggest that the rumors might finally be true. Stocks in construction companies and other related local industries spiked on the announcement, at least the second time this year that has happened. Leaked quotes over recent weeks insist that all that remains to be negotiated are small details, and those are insignificant in the grand scheme of the deal.

Another piece of the puzzle has come this weekend, when the ever talkative Mayor Han Zhang announced he’d hold a press conference this week to discuss the project. According to the Mayor, since he apparently gets asked about the Disney project at every press conference, it’s now time to discuss the issue and there are so many aspects of the subject to discuss that it requires its own press event. Other reports echo that a deal is near, with many of the few remaining points of discussion surrounding various trade and media deals that accompany the park agreement. Disney is using the Shanghai park as its major entry into the Chinese entertainment market, and so the eventual deal will have a far greater scope than the park itself. It also hinges, in part, on the continuing progress of Sino-U.S. trade negotiations.

Rumors about the resort itself have flourished over the years; most recent reports peg it as a $3.6 billion development, of which Disney will own a 43% stake and a local government-owned holding company would own 57%. While the Shanghai government originally suggested that Disney build on the underdeveloped Chongming Island, Disney rejected that site and opted to build on the mainland. The park will now occupy an 8-10 acre site in the town of Chuansha, on the southern edge of Shanghai’s Pudong district. It is currently slated to open in 2013. While the delay in an actual deal might have proved frustrating to fans, it has also allowed the Chinese government to make the necessary infrastructure upgrades to the fairly rural area. Shanghai Disneyland, when built, will benefit immediately from high-speed rail links and direct connections to major highways.

Possible Shanghai Disneyland site planRumored “leaked” site plan for Shanghai Disneyland development. First phase of development is outlined in red; the theme park area is circled in pink. Note how the C-shaped lake resembles the park’s rendering from 2006. Also note the MagLev depot to the north of the park. Personally, I think the Piggery will be a definite E-ticket. Click to enlarge.

What the park’s attraction lineup will resemble has been a source of great speculation recently. While a leaked site plan, allegedly by the ARUP development corporation, contains a water feature that greatly resembles the 2006 park rendering, it’s unknown if the eventual park will match any of these designs. After all, Hong Kong Disneyland itself differed greatly from even its early official press releases, and the pirate land concept for Hong Kong that was also featured prominently in the 2006 annual report was eventually abandoned.

Much of the discussion online has been about how Disney’s new franchise mania will affect the park’s aesthetic. Many expect pirates, princesses, pixies, and Pixar to rule the day, and if fans think the current park attractions are character-heavy then they haven’t seen anything yet. The latest gossip, featured on Screamscape and elsewhere, brings up the possibility that the Shanghai site will be Disney’s first park to include characters from Marvel Comics. Others expect the park to receive Hong Kong’s rejected pirate land, although that is sheer speculation.

Nevertheless, this will be the first Disney park to fully reflect CEO Bob Iger’s oft-stated push for “franchises” and “properties.” The sole purpose of this park, from management’s perspective, often seems to be to fully inject Disney’s intellectual property into the subconscious of billions of young Chinese. Regardless of Imagineers’ sincere efforts to build a quality theme park, some fans are concerned that the real purpose of Shanghai Disneyland is not to create a great park but to capitalize on all those viewers of the new Disney cable and satellite channels and of millions of hopefully non-pirated DVDs. The final product’s makeup can be deduced by the occasional comments by management over difficulties in Hong Kong; they often speak of how Chinese children are unfamiliar with western fairytales and are thus unaffected by the traditional Fantasyland attractions. Unless they’re planning on basing Shanghai Disneyland on traditional Chinese stories, which I doubt, or letting quality attractions stand on their own merits, which I also doubt, one fears that the order of the day will be Pixar, Pixar, Pixar.

But again, this is all speculation. It appears that Disney is trying to build a new kind of Disney kingdom, which is good considering that there are already two traditional Disneyland-type parks within the region. There’s certainly room for innovation, and hopefully in the shadow of Hong Kong Disneyland’s difficulties the Imagineers will be given wider leeway to really build something that impresses. We still have no idea when we’ll ever actually find out something substantive about the project, but all signs indicate that it will be sooner rather than later.

UPDATE: It looks like land expropriation for the resort has begun. Apparently, for several years the Shanghai government has been filing preparatory expropriation plans for something called “Buenaland Shanghai”. Very clever, guys. Apparently the Shanghai press, who didn’t pick up on this at all, needs to hire some Disney nerds.

Related Posts...

101… Damnations?

Hellfire and brimstone are topics not usually associated with Walt Disney Productions.

– Walt Disney Productions, 1981

Satan!No, that title is not me being clever and kind of inappropriate. It’s Disney being kind of inappropriate!

I’ve been waiting to show this one to you for a while. This fascinating article appeared in the Disney Studios cast publication, the Disney Newsreel, in February of 1981. Eventually you discover that it’s a tie-in with the soon-to-flop The Devil and Max Devlin, but at first glance it just looks like someone at Disney decided to do a mid-February summation of all the times Satan appeared in Disney films (this was before Satan transferred to Parks & Resorts and changed his name to Paul Pressler). Did you know that Satan had his Disney debut in the 1929 Silly Symphony, Hell’s Bells? Oh, it’s true.

Enjoy this odd bit of self-promotion from days of yore, as you consider the age-old question: Who’s really more evil, Satan or Hannah Montana?

101 Damnations, Page 1   101 Damnations, Page 2

Related Posts...

Happy Halloween!

Happy Halloween

Happy Halloween from the corruptible mortals here at Progress City. Why not look at some links from Halloweens past, or just pay a visit to the greatest haunted house of all? This video tour of the Haunted Mansion, which can be downloaded here, is the greatest fan video of the attraction I’ve seen, and its fantastic stereo audio calls for your best speakers or headphones. So as you get back from your trick-or-treating, why not turn down your lights, turn up your sound system, and enjoy all 999 happy haunts… it’s the next best thing to being there!

Related Posts...

Makin’ Memories, 1974 Style

Way back in the day, before human ingenuity blessed us with the miracle of digital photography, you actually had to think before you took a picture. Why, in my day we couldn’t just cast around taking hundreds of pictures willy-nilly with our cameras and iPhones and hula-hoops and dungarees; we had to stop, analyze the situation, and make sure we were getting the best possible photo for our money. Yes, it’s true – we had to pay for every single picture we took, and every stray thumb in the lens or backlit silhouette of Aunt Debbie was hard-earned money down the drain. And often you wouldn’t know your pictures were terrible until weeks later when they came back from the photomat – stupid 70s people!

But thanks to former Disney sponsor GAF, those avocado loving, AMC Pacer driving victims of stagflation could pick up a few handy tips to maximize their film budget and keep the folks back home entertained. We’ve already talked about my favorite tip from this list, but there are many other wise words here – even for all you kids today from the digital generation!

GAF Walt Disney World photo tips, 1974“Outstanding pictures don’t just happen … they are planned.”

OK. Steady camera… watch the focus… thumb out of the way… Good to go. Thank heavens I have plenty of fresh tungsten film!

GAF Walt Disney World photo tips, 1974“Family pictures are important, but a few go a long way.”

Here, of course, we learn that it’s good to have your family recognizable in photos – but not too many. Also, we can see that they used to sell sweet his-and-hers child ponchos at the Magic Kingdom. Nothing said Disney in the 1970s more than mouse ears and a pink sarape, that’s for sure! Maybe they had been to the Pueblo Room at the Contemporary?

Also notice the lack of a canopy over the teacups.

GAF also kindly gave us some tips for home movies – pan slowly, zoom sparingly, and always wind your motor. All good advice, even today. I laughed out loud at the highlighted rule that a scene should last a minimum of five full seconds to be enjoyed and understood. Maybe I can slip this guide to the folks that make the mail-order Disney Parks promo videos or that produce the Christmas Parade – I think they’ve accidentally misread it as five picoseconds per edit. And NEVER ZOOM AND PAN AT THE SAME TIME! I’m sending that one to Michael Bay.

And it would take 100,000 flashbulbs to light Cinderella’s Castle at night, so don’t even try. Is it me, or is this guide a little snippy? “Fifteen different shots of the Cinderella Castle are fine for a ‘castle picture collection'” – what a burn! Stupid tourists with your memories!

So take these tips to heart, shutterbugs. And the next time you’re in the Kingdom don’t forget these valuable tips – or GAF will come to your house and mock you to your face!

Related Posts...