Contribute to Our Research
|
By Michael - December 7th, 2010 One of the kookiest things to pop up online lately is this pre-visualization reel for Rapunzel Unbraided, one of the earlier incarnations of the film now known as Tangled. The film had a long and tortured development, subject to the whims of management earlier in the decade. Originally a traditionally animated fairy tale, it became a CGI project as director Glen Keane tried to save it from going down with the hand-drawn ship when Eisner & company shifted all development to computer animation. Seeing the success of Shrek, management decided they wanted a more “modern” take on things and so Rapunzel became Rapunzel Unbraided, a wacky, “hip and edgy” fractured fairy tale.
That’s the version of the film that this clip is from. According to the caption on YouTube, this dates to 2005 and is credited to Tony Hudson.
Thankfully, this approach to the story was abandoned and the film once more became a traditional tale when Disney bought Pixar in 2006.
We’ve had teases of other early versions of this film online; this animation test shows a different look for the heroine and features her earlier sidekick – a squirrel:
As you can see, it’s a different take on the material. In fact, some of the early publicity artwork published for the film depicted scenes from this version. How late were these major changes made? And how odd is it that most of the film we know was made in the last year, when it was in development for almost a decade? Animation can be weird sometimes. Here’s hoping that we get a quality Blu-ray with lots of information on what these alternate-universe features were like.
Related Posts...
By Michael - December 7th, 2010 
Now that Tangled (or Rapunzel, for the non hip-and-edgy among us) has hit theaters to great critical and financial success, hopefully everyone has taken a moment to congratulate the folks at Walt Disney Animation Studios, directors Nathan Greno and Byron Howard, and most definitely and especially Glen Keane, who has spent most of the last decade trying to get this story to screen.
Of course, the big question on everyone’s lips is… what’s next? What can we take away from this, and what does it mean for the future? So far, there have been no hints from Disney. Their current slate consists of next year’s traditionally animated Winnie the Pooh, and the quasi-announced CGI Reboot Ralph in 2013. We’ve seen them alter The Frog Princess to make it the more allegedly “girl-friendly” The Princess and the Frog; we’ve seen them panic and alter Rapunzel to make it the more allegedly “boy-friendly” Tangled; we’ve seen that same panic lead to the abandonment of the hand-drawn Snow Queen and the revival of the videogame-themed Reboot Ralph.
 My reaction to pretty much all animation news
Then, right before the release of the film, we’ve seen a prominent story in the L.A. Times focusing on statements by Ed Catmull about how Disney was going to get out of the fairytale business for a while; after an explosion of media interest (and fan hackles), Catmull rolled back the story with this statement on Facebook (!):
A headline in today’s LA Times erroneously reported that the Disney fairy tale is a thing of the past, but I feel it is important to set the record straight that they are alive and well at Disney and continue this week with Tangled, a contemporary retelling of a much loved story. We have a number of projects in development with new twists that audiences will be able to enjoy for many years to come. – Ed Catmull
As to what those projects are, however, we’re left to guess. Although I have to say that I had to laugh at the statement in the Times that John Lasseter has been “encouraging filmmakers to break with safe and predictable formulas and push creative boundaries.” This from the director of Cars 2 and the producer of Toy Story 3, Monsters Inc. 2 and Winnie the Pooh. As to telling filmmakers, “‘Tell us what’s driving you,” I’d like to hear that question asked of Chris Sanders or Brenda Chapman.
ANYWAY… Tangled. After all the fretting, it roared into theaters with a $70 million five-day Thanksgiving weekend. This was the best opening for a Disney animated feature ever, and the second-highest Thanksgiving debut ever behind Toy Story 2. The film continued strong in its second weekend, taking first place from previous champ Harry Potter and wrapping its first twelve days with $96.5 million in the bank. More than likely, by its third weekend it will surpass the entire box office take of The Princess and the Frog.
But what does it all mean? That CGI will, by default, beat hand-drawn animation? That the title change was some master stroke of marketing? That people don’t like princess fairy tales but really do but only if you call them something else?
The film’s early marketing was derided by animation fans for being generally awful, and word of mouth about the picture did not improve until a massive wave of preview screenings were held before release. Almost uniformly, the word came out: “This movie is nothing like its previews! It’s really good!”
This shored up rumors that had existed since the very first teaser trailer. After each new trailer or commercial, the film’s animators would pop up in the usual online hangouts to beg people not to believe what they were seeing. “This isn’t our movie,” they’d say – “Our movie is really good, we promise!” Well, they were right. And sure enough, those trailers were not indicative of the film. Let’s take a look at that first trailer, which was the most lamentable:
Now of all the animation clips in that trailer, less than half appear in the actual film. Yep. And the rest are, for the most part, taken out of context. So there’s that.
Thankfully, they did decide to have those screenings and word of mouth spread like wildfire. Audience polling by Cinemascore recorded a very rare perfect A+ score, something no other film this year – not Toy Story 3, not Inception – achieved. And the word of mouth seems to have paid off.
And how about the movie? Yeah, it’s good. Really good. I still would love to see Keane’s vision, and out of curiosity I’d like to see the handful of other takes on the story that were developed over the last ten years. But thankfully this time all the retooling still resulted in a successful film. The visual style, art design, lighting and shading is all absolutely gorgeous, and really does avoid that plastic look that so often plagues CG animation. The animation itself is very detailed and nuanced, and save for some very unfortunate exceptions avoids the stereotypical “attitude” that has become the bane of animation fans.
 Ooh. Pretty.
More important, the characters are both believable and likeable – Rapunzel herself is a delight and the “rogue” Flynn Rider overcomes a very iffy start to become not nearly as irritating as everyone thought he would be. Mother Gothel, Rapunzel’s captor, starts off pretty overwhelmingly camp but overcomes that as the films go on. Even the “cute sidekicks,” the chameleon Pascal and Maximus the horse, are very well animated and act entirely in pantomime, reminiscent of Disney’s best.
 Appeal!
So, seriously, congratulations to everyone at Disney Animation. Here’s hoping that this leads to a little job security for everyone, and that management learns the right lessons from this (I know, I know) and lets you really flex your creative muscles on some new projects. It’s time to put some new projects in the pipeline, and some of those should involve some challenging new hand-drawn animation. Hopefully, with a little success under their belt, we’ll have fewer decisions motivated by fear. Tangled, at the very least, proves that Disney can still do what Disney does best.
Related Posts...
By Michael - December 7th, 2010 
I’m a few days late with the update for this month, but fear not because the Walt Disney Family Museum has an excellent slate for goodies for your holiday season. Time for Christmas with Walt!
SCREENINGS + DISCUSSIONS
FILM OF THE MONTH – November 26-December 31
Christmas with Walt Disney
1:00pm and 4:00pm daily, Theater
(except Tuesdays, December 5, December 11 and December 25.)
Tickets available online at www.waltdisney.org
Produced exclusively for the Museum by Don Hahn, (The Lion King and Beauty and the Beast) this special holiday screening includes The Nutcracker Suite from Fantasia (1940), Pluto’s Christmas Tree (1952), scenes from the television Christmas specials, and rarely-seen home movies of Walt and his family. See how Walt celebrated Christmas at the studio, at Disneyland, and at home!
December 11 – A Tribute to Art Linkletter
3:00 pm, Theater
Tickets available online at www.waltdisney.org
Celebrate the life and career of one of America’s most popular television hosts—he hosted the live broadcast of the opening day of Disneyland!—and a great friend of Walt Disney’s: Art Linkletter! Author and historian Don Peri will talk with Art’s daughter, Sharon, about what it was like to grow up in the Linkletter household.
MUSIC
December 18 – Artists’ Vocal Ensemble: A Candlelight Christmas
4:00pm and 6:15pm, Special Exhibition Hall
Join us for an evening of Christmas songs and carols. This hour long program will include contemporary American carols, anthems, and will conclude with a festive family sing-a-long. A perfect way to celebrate the holiday season.
DECEMBER DISNEY DISCOVERIES! + LOOK CLOSER SERIES
DISNEY DISCOVERIES: Second Saturday of each month
December 11 – Disney Discoveries!
1:00 pm – 3:00 pm, Learning Center Art Studio
Join us in the holiday spirit and bring your creativity! We will be making holiday ornaments that you can hang from your tree or window.
Imaginations and creativity will soar with our new Disney Discoveries! The second Saturday of each month, join us for family fun and activities in the Learning Center. The activities planned by our education staff will inspire the hidden artist in young visitors while learning about the life and work of Walt Disney.
LOOK CLOSER:
December 17, 18 + 19 – Look Closer: Walt’s Skis
11:00 am and 3:00 pm, Gallery 3
Walt was an avid skier, and in the Disney short starring Goofy—“The Art of Skiing”—you can even see influences of Walt in the Goof himself! Join us in Gallery 3 on December 17, 18 +19 to learn more about Walt Disney’s skis and his love for this snowy sport.
Would you like to know more about one of the artifacts in the galleries? Our Look Closer series will give you that opportunity—staff will reveal little known facts, behind the scenes information, or just additional information during the 5 to 8-minute gallery talk.
Related Posts...
By Michael - December 6th, 2010 
It’s been a busy year here in Progress City so perhaps it’s not surprising that we’re just now catching up on our critical reading material from 2010. Of the Disney park-related books published this year, few made as big a splash as Project Future, The Inside Story Behind the Creation of Disney World by Chad Emerson. Detailing the behind-the-scenes wrangling that led to the site selection and real estate acquisition for Walt Disney World in the 1960s, Emerson’s tale is a fascinating look at a subject that has to this point remained sadly under-documented.
Emerson, a faculty member at the Faulkner University Jones School of Law, is a long-time observer of the theme park industry and he was therefore able to draw on several years of interviews with key players in the “cloak and dagger” maneuvers of Disney’s agents in Florida. These contributions, by individuals like Robert Price Foster, Tom DeWolf, and former Governor Claude Kirk, provide a sense of what went on in those mysterious secret meetings as Disney slowly purchased its 27,000 acres in Central Florida.
The story of Disneyland-East, though, began long before Disney’s land purchases in 1965. Walt had planned eastward expansion as early as the late 1950s, and during subsequent years a number of sites for new projects were considered from Miami Beach to Niagara Falls, St. Louis, and even Marceline, Missouri. These projects are covered in Project Future, along with reasons for their abandonment.
After selecting Central Florida for the new Disney resort, there remained the matter of finding suitable contiguous plots of land and persuading the owners to sell – all without disclosing the buyer. Emerson covers the entire process, including several difficulties along the way that one might not even consider when thinking about how to secretly buy 40+ square miles of Florida swamp and ranch land. Even after purchasing the land, the project’s fate remained uncertain unless Disney could convince the Florida legislature to grant them special powers to govern their property. While the details of special district legislation and drainage governance don’t naturally lend themselves to riveting narrative, Emerson keeps things moving and doesn’t get bogged down along the way.
The story of Walt Disney World’s secret land purchase is pretty well known to fans, but until you see the entire story laid out one really doesn’t comprehend just how crazy a process it was, and just how close it came to falling through on many different occasions. When viewed in context, Walt Disney World’s creation can really be seen as having stemmed directly from Disneyland’s success and the events of the 1964/65 World’s Fair; likewise, it’s also apparent that the complicated legal wrangling behind the project was intended to lay the foundation for Walt’s EPCOT – a real, working city of the future.
Emerson tells the story in a fairly straightforward journalistic style, and the story moves quickly. Unfortunately, the book lacks citations or footnotes, which is a buzzkill for nerds like me, and the lack of an index makes reference use difficult. There is also the occasional editorial oversight; most are insignificant but some are notable.
Hopefully Emerson’s book will be the first in a new wave of Walt Disney World scholarship leading up to the resort’s 40th anniversary next year. There’s still a lot to be said on the subject. Thankfully things are off to a good start, with this well-sourced look at the resort’s mysterious beginnings.
Project Future, The Inside Story Behind the Creation of Disney World – 189 pages, softcover. Published by Ayefour Publishing. $14.95. Available in print and for Kindle.
Related Posts...
By Michael - December 1st, 2010 
When veteran actor Leslie Nielsen passed away last weekend, most tributes focused on his later career in a series of spoofs and slapstick comedies. Some mentioned his earlier career as a dramatic actor and leading man, but none that I saw covered his connection to Walt Disney. My first thought upon hearing the news was of The Swamp Fox, the eight-part serial that aired on the Disney anthology television program between 1959 and 1961. Having grown up in the age of Airplane! and The Naked Gun, it was surreal to discover that Nielsen had once portrayed the very serious Revolutionary War hero Francis Marion – and even crooned a bit on the theme song!
Any rundown of Nielsen’s career that I could provide would pale in comparison to the story by Jeff Kurtti on the Walt Disney Family Museum’s Storyboard blog. Kurtti covers not only Nielsen but also the other Frontierland heroes that Disney filmed in an attempt to re-capture the Davy Crockett magic. I encourage you all to check it out and to leave a comment – we could use more scholarship about this era in the Disney canon.
For those of you who have missed out over the years, some of Nielsen’s Tory-fighting antics can be found on YouTube.
Related Posts...
|
The Progress City Primer
 From the Progress City archives comes this collection of 33 tall tales and true from Disney history. Available in paperback, hardback, and ebook formats.
|
Recent Comments